Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Learner Tien vs Cannon Kingsley Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tien vs Kingsley analysis and find out who is favored!
Learner Tien vs Cannon Kingsley Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tien 1 - 0 Kingsley
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tien has won 56.48% of points on their second serve, while Kingsley has won 54.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tien, in recent form, has won 55.23% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kingsley has won 54.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.94% and 24.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tien has saved 66.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kingsley has saved 60.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tien has won 82% of matches played (W/L 41/ 9), with Kingsley winning 56.25% (W/L 27/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tien has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 79% (W/L 11/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Kingsley has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 22/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 40/ 32).
- Player level: In the last year, Tien has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 89.19% of matches (W/L 33/ 4), where as Kingsley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 14/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tien winning 1 times and Kingsley being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tien winning 2 and Kingsley winning 0. The last match between Tien and Kingsley was at the Fairfield Challenger, 08-10-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Learner Tien getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tien and Kingsley have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tien winning 0 times and Kingsley 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tien winning 0, and Kingsley 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tien has played against opponents with an average rank of 122.06 while Kingsley has played against players with an average rank of 205.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tien has won 79% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kingsley has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tien has converted 52.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kingsley has converted 44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
398
Rank
398
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
408
Rank
404
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
71% (56-23)
Career Total W/L
59% (99-68)
82% (14-3)
YTD W/L
50% (4-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Learner Tien | Cannon Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:43 | 2:0:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (51/89) | 61% (54/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (32/51) | 57% (31/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (19/38) | 47% (16/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 15% (2/13) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (41/88) | 43% (38/89) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Learner Tien
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Learner Tien | Cannon Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 82% (14/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 73% (29/11) | 50% (11/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 61% (228/146) | 52% (116/109) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 88% (14/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.65 |
| Aces Total | 44 | 71 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 37 | 15 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:50 | 2:11:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 139.65 | 38.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (747/1218) | 69% (483/701) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (506/747) | 72% (348/483) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (266/471) | 55% (119/218) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (76/144) | 44% (22/50) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (519/1145) | 37% (259/709) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 91% (10/1) | 67% (4/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 82% (14/17) | 50% (4/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 83% (5/6) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (13/13) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (13/0) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 33% (3/1) |
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Alafia Ayeni
62%
(
69 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
2
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
8
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
115
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Noah Schachter
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Isaac Becroft
44%
(
15 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Bryce Nakashima
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Karue Sell
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Alex Knaff
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Nathan Ponwith
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Matt Kuhar
60%
(
64 of
106)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
44 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Braden Shick
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cannon Kingsley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Cannon Kingsley
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Cannon Kingsley
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
6
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
23 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Nathan Mao
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Cannon Kingsley
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
10
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
52 of
65)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
24 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Henry Searle
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
9
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Jonas Forejtek
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
10
Aces
8
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
61 of
78)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
26 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
34 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
71%
(
73 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Cannon Kingsley
48%
(
48 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
33%
(
17 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Cannon Kingsley
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
89 of
135)
13
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
54 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
65 of
89)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
22 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
46 of
135)
125
Total Points Won
111
|
7-5 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Cannon Kingsley
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tien Vs Kingsley Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Tien are available here and Kingsley photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Cannon Kingsley
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
